tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2540658255223609762.post5856070244055283434..comments2023-04-28T10:59:54.402-04:00Comments on The Illusion of Productivity: the gaff that wasn'tMercedeshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/14948056619376854624noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2540658255223609762.post-52555385992872505442011-08-13T18:47:25.150-04:002011-08-13T18:47:25.150-04:00you go it. it seems like attacks on corporations ...you go it. it seems like attacks on corporations basically amount to attacks on the wealthy. the majority can force the wealthy to pay for stuff....but that doesn't mean the wealthy can't say anything about it. <br /><br />what kind of extra "corporate rights" are you talking about?Mercedeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14948056619376854624noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-2540658255223609762.post-65189794998495900602011-08-13T18:00:37.506-04:002011-08-13T18:00:37.506-04:00so your analogy is meant to imply that corporation...so your analogy is meant to imply that corporations are like the people that always buy our lunch? <br /><br />It is true that people who have a stake in corporations shouldn't lose their rights as individuals. But should they get an extra level of "corporate rights" that people not in corporations don't have access to?Redbeardhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04904446896535209789noreply@blogger.com